<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>《中国传媒报告》期刊官方网站</title>
	<atom:link href="http://media.yejun.cn/wordpress/?feed=rss2" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://media.yejun.cn/wordpress</link>
	<description>media.yejun.cn</description>
	<pubDate>Tue, 22 Jun 2010 11:21:21 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.7.1</generator>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
			<item>
		<title>剖析传播学术中的“欧洲中心主义”：亚洲中心性在理论及研究去西方化过程中的作用 【作者：三池贤孝 J.Z.爱门森译】</title>
		<link>http://media.yejun.cn/wordpress/?p=2653</link>
		<comments>http://media.yejun.cn/wordpress/?p=2653#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 22 Jun 2010 11:21:21 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>admin</dc:creator>
		
		<category><![CDATA[2010年第二期]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://media.yejun.cn/wordpress/?p=2653</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[【摘要】：本文对欧洲中心的传播知识结构加以质疑，提出亚洲传播研究中亚洲中心性的合理性。文章的第一部分对人性、文化特定性和传播的本质及其交叉加以重新阐释；第二部分接着论述了欧洲中心主义作为意识形态的“笼统化”（totalization）和“轻视化”（trivialization）；第三部分对“亚洲中心性”的元理论概念加以阐明，证明其理论必要性。本文最后提出亚洲中心性对传播学术进行“去西方化”的五条途径。它们是：（1）形成与亚洲传播讨论相应的理论认识；（2）关注于亚洲传播经验的多样性和复杂性；（3）省察地构建及批判地改进亚洲传播的讨论；（4）对“如何在亚洲文化特定性中表达和理解人性的普遍特征”进行理论探讨；（5）对理论研究中的欧洲中心倾向加以批评，并且帮助亚洲研究者克服学术依赖。
【关键词】：学术依赖，非洲中心性，亚洲中心性，传播理论，文化特定性，去西方化，多样性，欧洲中心主义，人性，横截性
Abstract: This article problematizes the Eurocentric structure of communicative knowledge and advocates the legitimacy of Asiacentricity in Asian communication studies. The first section of the article re-articulates the nature and intersection of humanity, cultural particularities, and communication. The second section then addresses Eurocentrism as ideologies of totalization and trivialization. The third section clarifies the metatheoretical [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>【摘要】：本文对欧洲中心的传播知识结构加以质疑，提出亚洲传播研究中亚洲中心性的合理性。文章的第一部分对人性、文化特定性和传播的本质及其交叉加以重新阐释；第二部分接着论述了欧洲中心主义作为意识形态的“笼统化”（totalization）和“轻视化”（trivialization）；第三部分对“亚洲中心性”的元理论概念加以阐明，证明其理论必要性。本文最后提出亚洲中心性对传播学术进行“去西方化”的五条途径。它们是：（1）形成与亚洲传播讨论相应的理论认识；（2）关注于亚洲传播经验的多样性和复杂性；（3）省察地构建及批判地改进亚洲传播的讨论；（4）对“如何在亚洲文化特定性中表达和理解人性的普遍特征”进行理论探讨；（5）对理论研究中的欧洲中心倾向加以批评，并且帮助亚洲研究者克服学术依赖。<br />
【关键词】：学术依赖，非洲中心性，亚洲中心性，传播理论，文化特定性，去西方化，多样性，欧洲中心主义，人性，横截性</p>
<p>Abstract: This article problematizes the Eurocentric structure of communicative knowledge and advocates the legitimacy of Asiacentricity in Asian communication studies. The first section of the article re-articulates the nature and intersection of humanity, cultural particularities, and communication. The second section then addresses Eurocentrism as ideologies of totalization and trivialization. The third section clarifies the metatheoretical notion of Asiacentricity and argues for its intellectual necessity. The present article finally envisions five ways in which Asiacentricity de-Westernizes communication scholarship. Asiacentricity (1) generates theoretical knowledge that corresponds to Asian communication discourse, (2) focuses on the multiplicity and complexity of Asian communicative experience, (3) reflexively constitutes and critically transforms Asian communication discourse, (4) theorizes how universal aspects of humanity are expressed and understood in Asian cultural particularities, and (5) critiques Eurocentric biases in theory and research and helps Asian researchers overcome academic dependency. [China Media Report Overseas. 2010; 6(2): 1-13]<br />
Key Words: academic dependency, Afrocentricity, Asiacentricity, communication theory, cultural particularities, de-Westernization, diversity, Eurocentrism, humanity, transversality   </p>
<p>PDF下载：<a href='http://media.yejun.cn/wordpress/wp-content/uploads/2010/06/e4ba9ae6b4b2e4b8ade5bf83e680a7e59ca8e79086e8aebae58f8ae7a094e7a9b6e58ebbe8a5bfe696b9e58c96e8bf87e7a88be4b8ade79a84e4bd9ce794a8.pdf' >剖析传播学术中的“欧洲中心主义”：亚洲中心性在理论及研究去西方化过程中的作用 【作者：三池贤孝 J.Z.爱门森译】</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://media.yejun.cn/wordpress/?feed=rss2&amp;p=2653</wfw:commentRss>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>政府以什么理由来“管理”媒体&#8211;美国政府与新闻媒体关系说 【作者：徐贲】</title>
		<link>http://media.yejun.cn/wordpress/?p=2650</link>
		<comments>http://media.yejun.cn/wordpress/?p=2650#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 22 Jun 2010 11:19:49 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>admin</dc:creator>
		
		<category><![CDATA[2010年第二期]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://media.yejun.cn/wordpress/?p=2650</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[[摘  要] 美国没有一部专门的新闻法，没有受政府控制的媒体，更没有一个管理媒体、出版、言论的宣传部。但是，美国媒体的运作有法可依。美国宪法第一修正案《权利法案》是关于新闻自由的最高准则。《权利法案》用一种“否定性”的语态对政府权力的边界作出规定，同时也就宣告了公民权利的范围，在这一范围内，政府权力的活动受到宪法的限制。与《独立宣言》中的自然法相一致，《权利法案》的价值表述具有启蒙时期“天赋人权”的特征。它把个体权利认定为是先于国家而存在的，个体权利构成对公共权力的限制，并且为公共权力的范围划定了边界。所以，个体是否具有哪些权利，无需通过立法来加以宣告或者“赋予”。美国政府与媒体有时候会发生摩擦，摩擦的发生和化解方式都体现了美国的政治体制特点和社会价值观。
[关键词] 美国政府；美国媒体；政府管理
Abstract: The United States does not have any specific press laws, and the media is not subject to government controlling without any propaganda authorities in charging of media, press, and public expression. However, the operation of the American media is still on their own laws. The United States Constitution&#8217;s first amendment, [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[摘  要] 美国没有一部专门的新闻法，没有受政府控制的媒体，更没有一个管理媒体、出版、言论的宣传部。但是，美国媒体的运作有法可依。美国宪法第一修正案《权利法案》是关于新闻自由的最高准则。《权利法案》用一种“否定性”的语态对政府权力的边界作出规定，同时也就宣告了公民权利的范围，在这一范围内，政府权力的活动受到宪法的限制。与《独立宣言》中的自然法相一致，《权利法案》的价值表述具有启蒙时期“天赋人权”的特征。它把个体权利认定为是先于国家而存在的，个体权利构成对公共权力的限制，并且为公共权力的范围划定了边界。所以，个体是否具有哪些权利，无需通过立法来加以宣告或者“赋予”。美国政府与媒体有时候会发生摩擦，摩擦的发生和化解方式都体现了美国的政治体制特点和社会价值观。<br />
[关键词] 美国政府；美国媒体；政府管理</p>
<p>Abstract: The United States does not have any specific press laws, and the media is not subject to government controlling without any propaganda authorities in charging of media, press, and public expression. However, the operation of the American media is still on their own laws. The United States Constitution&#8217;s first amendment, as the Bill of rights is the primary law for the freedom of press. Actually, the Bill of rights clarify the boundaries of government’s power by   using &#8220;negative&#8221; voice to make provision, in the meanwhile, the scope of civil rights is also announced in this context. And the Declaration of independence is consistent with the law; the Bill of rights has the features of &#8220;natural rights&#8221; as in the enlightenment era. Individual right is prior to the State; individual right hence constitutes limitation to public right, and define the boundaries between them. Therefore, what rights the individual should have, is unnecessary be granted or announced by legislation. The U.S Government and media sometimes may have frictions, and the manners about how the frictions are formed and dissolved in fact embody the American political system and social values.<br />
Key Words: the United States Government; the American Media; Government Management</p>
<p>PDF下载：<a href='http://media.yejun.cn/wordpress/wp-content/uploads/2010/06/e694bfe5ba9ce4bba5e4bb80e4b988e79086e794b1e69da5e2809ce7aea1e79086e2809de5aa92e4bd93efbc88e5be90e8b4b2efbc89.pdf' >政府以什么理由来“管理”媒体&#8211;美国政府与新闻媒体关系说 【作者：徐贲】</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://media.yejun.cn/wordpress/?feed=rss2&amp;p=2650</wfw:commentRss>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>中国式道歉的沟通方式：请罪、谢罪、赔罪&#8211;以“负荆请罪”的本文分析为例 【作者：王怡红】</title>
		<link>http://media.yejun.cn/wordpress/?p=2647</link>
		<comments>http://media.yejun.cn/wordpress/?p=2647#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 22 Jun 2010 11:16:55 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>admin</dc:creator>
		
		<category><![CDATA[2010年第二期]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://media.yejun.cn/wordpress/?p=2647</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[【摘要】：本文选择中国式道歉沟通的研究视角，以“负荆请罪”为分析文本，集中从“请罪”、“谢罪”、“赔罪”三个方面，考察汉语“道歉”一词的传统含义；中国人把道歉作为沟通关系的使用方式；以及道歉必须具备完全认错的文化倾向及观念等。
【关键词】：道歉；传播；人际传播；”负荆请罪“；中国文化
Abstract:  The most Chinese can tell a famous and classical story of apology  proffer a birch and ask for a flogging (FuJingQingZhui) that represents the Chinese cultural idea of apology and provides unexpected insights into the study of Chinese apology. This story of a successful apology embodies the apologetic ideality of Chinese and [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>【摘要】：本文选择中国式道歉沟通的研究视角，以“负荆请罪”为分析文本，集中从“请罪”、“谢罪”、“赔罪”三个方面，考察汉语“道歉”一词的传统含义；中国人把道歉作为沟通关系的使用方式；以及道歉必须具备完全认错的文化倾向及观念等。<br />
【关键词】：道歉；传播；人际传播；”负荆请罪“；中国文化</p>
<p>Abstract:  The most Chinese can tell a famous and classical story of apology  proffer a birch and ask for a flogging (FuJingQingZhui) that represents the Chinese cultural idea of apology and provides unexpected insights into the study of Chinese apology. This story of a successful apology embodies the apologetic ideality of Chinese and power of the apology process, it illustrates how Chinese language has a wide range of apology words, such as qingzhui, xiezhui and feizhui,and many others. In this story, the author see the Chinese apologies are more likely to include expressions of unconditional and  absolute apologies than do English apologies and the interplay of these words.<br />
Key Words: Apology; Communication; Interpersonal Communication; Proffer a Birch and Ask for a Flogging(FuJingQingZui); Chinese Culture</p>
<p>PDF下载：<a href='http://media.yejun.cn/wordpress/wp-content/uploads/2010/06/e8b49fe88d86e8afb7e7bdaae98193e6ad89e7a094e7a9b6e8aebae69687e4bca0e5aa92e68aa5e5918ae7a8bf20100423.pdf' >中国式道歉的沟通方式：请罪、谢罪、赔罪&#8211;以“负荆请罪”的本文分析为例 【作者：王怡红】</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://media.yejun.cn/wordpress/?feed=rss2&amp;p=2647</wfw:commentRss>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>中国大陆传播学交叉研究的回顾与前瞻 【作者：周岩】</title>
		<link>http://media.yejun.cn/wordpress/?p=2644</link>
		<comments>http://media.yejun.cn/wordpress/?p=2644#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 22 Jun 2010 11:12:02 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>admin</dc:creator>
		
		<category><![CDATA[2010年第二期]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://media.yejun.cn/wordpress/?p=2644</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[【摘要】：传播学交叉研究促进本学科不断创新，同时繁荣丰富了其他学科，促进各学科的协调发展，成为连接其他诸多学科的纽带。中国大陆传播学交叉研究的发展大致可以分成起步阶段（1978——1989）、全面推进阶段（1990——1999）和继续拓展阶段（2000——至今）。研究呈现出跨学科性、综合创造性、主体协作性、相对独立性的科研特征，并以移植型研究、中心理论型研究、聚焦型研究的基本形式开展。在研究内容上，与传播学进行交叉的学科主要集中在社会科学范围之内，研究始终密切联系我国社会发展的现实问题，正不断追赶国际前沿研究并期待有所突破。在当前存在的不足有：传播学交叉领域和主题丰富多样，但缺乏多样性的统一；一些交叉研究浅尝辄止，对国外成果有一定的依赖性；跨学科合作存在着一些现实的困难。
【关键词】：传播学，媒介理论，交叉研究，新兴学科，中国大陆
Abstract：The Communication interdisciplinary studies not only promote the discipline innovation, but also prosper and enrich many other subjects. In addition, the studies become the link that connects many other subjects to harmonize the advancement of various subjects. The process can be divided into several stages including the initial stage（1978——1989）, comprehensively propulsion stage（1990——1999）and Continued expansion stage（2000——present）. [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>【摘要】：传播学交叉研究促进本学科不断创新，同时繁荣丰富了其他学科，促进各学科的协调发展，成为连接其他诸多学科的纽带。中国大陆传播学交叉研究的发展大致可以分成起步阶段（1978——1989）、全面推进阶段（1990——1999）和继续拓展阶段（2000——至今）。研究呈现出跨学科性、综合创造性、主体协作性、相对独立性的科研特征，并以移植型研究、中心理论型研究、聚焦型研究的基本形式开展。在研究内容上，与传播学进行交叉的学科主要集中在社会科学范围之内，研究始终密切联系我国社会发展的现实问题，正不断追赶国际前沿研究并期待有所突破。在当前存在的不足有：传播学交叉领域和主题丰富多样，但缺乏多样性的统一；一些交叉研究浅尝辄止，对国外成果有一定的依赖性；跨学科合作存在着一些现实的困难。<br />
【关键词】：传播学，媒介理论，交叉研究，新兴学科，中国大陆</p>
<p>Abstract：The Communication interdisciplinary studies not only promote the discipline innovation, but also prosper and enrich many other subjects. In addition, the studies become the link that connects many other subjects to harmonize the advancement of various subjects. The process can be divided into several stages including the initial stage（1978——1989）, comprehensively propulsion stage（1990——1999）and Continued expansion stage（2000——present）. The features of the research are: interdisciplinarity, integrated creativity, agent cooperation and relative independence. At the same time, its basic forms include transplanted research, centered theory research and focused research. In content, the subjects which intersect with Communication mainly focus on the social science fields, the researches always closely relate to the reality of China social development, and is constantly chasing the international forefront researches and looking forward to a breakthrough. The deficiencies in the current research are: The interdisciplinary fields and subjects are various, but lack in unity; Some are content with the commonplace, dependent on overseas results; There are some practical difficulties in interdisciplinary collaboration.<br />
Key words: Communication science, Media theory, Interdisciplinary research, Emerging discipline, Mainland China</p>
<p>PDF下载：<a href='http://media.yejun.cn/wordpress/wp-content/uploads/2010/06/e4b8ade59bbde5a4a7e99986e4bca0e692ade5ada6e4baa4e58f89e7a094e7a9b6e79a84e59b9ee9a1bee4b88ee5898de79ebb-efbc88e591a8e5b2a9efbc89.pdf' >中国大陆传播学交叉研究的回顾与前瞻 【作者：周岩】</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://media.yejun.cn/wordpress/?feed=rss2&amp;p=2644</wfw:commentRss>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>“帝国悖论：”官僚科层制与秦汉王朝的政治传播 【作者：潘祥辉】</title>
		<link>http://media.yejun.cn/wordpress/?p=2641</link>
		<comments>http://media.yejun.cn/wordpress/?p=2641#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 22 Jun 2010 11:10:16 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>admin</dc:creator>
		
		<category><![CDATA[2010年第二期]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://media.yejun.cn/wordpress/?p=2641</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[摘要：秦汉是中国官僚政治制度全面展开的时期，在这个以官僚科层制为核心的超稳定结构中，政治传播系统与官僚科层制相互耦合、嵌套，强化。科层官僚制使秦汉建立起统一的中央集权帝国，统一的文字、发达的交通、邮驿系统以及政治文书系统维系着帝国的有效运转。但庞大的官僚科层体系与复杂的委托－代理链条使秦汉政治传播中的信息歪曲与失真不可避免。帝国治理的“效率悖论”由此形成：若无独立的信息收集系统，科层越严密，则传播效率越低，科层制负功能越明显。这是官僚科层制本身的内蕴特征。通过对秦汉帝国的组织结构分析，我们看到的是官僚科层制与政治传播之间的内在关联。
关键词：官僚  科层制 秦汉 政治传播
Abstract: Qin&#038;Han Dynasty is the the period that bureaucratic system is fully launched.In the the super-stable structure formed by the bureaucracy, the political communication system and the bureaucratic hierarchy of mutual coupling, nesting and strengthen. Bureaucracy to establish a unified centralized empire.Unified writing, advanced transportation ,postal system and official document to [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>摘要：秦汉是中国官僚政治制度全面展开的时期，在这个以官僚科层制为核心的超稳定结构中，政治传播系统与官僚科层制相互耦合、嵌套，强化。科层官僚制使秦汉建立起统一的中央集权帝国，统一的文字、发达的交通、邮驿系统以及政治文书系统维系着帝国的有效运转。但庞大的官僚科层体系与复杂的委托－代理链条使秦汉政治传播中的信息歪曲与失真不可避免。帝国治理的“效率悖论”由此形成：若无独立的信息收集系统，科层越严密，则传播效率越低，科层制负功能越明显。这是官僚科层制本身的内蕴特征。通过对秦汉帝国的组织结构分析，我们看到的是官僚科层制与政治传播之间的内在关联。<br />
关键词：官僚  科层制 秦汉 政治传播</p>
<p>Abstract: Qin&#038;Han Dynasty is the the period that bureaucratic system is fully launched.In the the super-stable structure formed by the bureaucracy, the political communication system and the bureaucratic hierarchy of mutual coupling, nesting and strengthen. Bureaucracy to establish a unified centralized empire.Unified writing, advanced transportation ,postal system and official document to maintain the  empire effective operation. But the huge and complex system of bureaucracy and the principal - agent chain made the distortion of information Inevitably in the Qin &#038; Han Dynasty.It lead to &#8220;efficiency paradox&#8221; of Imperial governance: If there are’t independent systems of information collection,then, the hierarchy more rigorous,the communication efficiency is lower,and the more obvious negative features. This is also the the intrinsic characteristics of the bureaucracy system.By analysis of the organizational structure of Qin&#038;Han empire, we can discover the internal relationship between political communication and the bureaucratic hierarchy.<br />
   Key words: Bureaucracy  political communication  Qin&#038;Han Dynasty</p>
<p>PDF下载：<a href='http://media.yejun.cn/wordpress/wp-content/uploads/2010/06/e5ae98e5839ae7a791e5b182e588b6e4b88ee4b8ade59bbde7a7a6e6b189e697b6e69c9fe79a84e694bfe6b2bbe4bca0e692adefbc88e6bd98e7a5a5e8be89efbc89.pdf' >“帝国悖论：”官僚科层制与秦汉王朝的政治传播 【作者：潘祥辉】</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://media.yejun.cn/wordpress/?feed=rss2&amp;p=2641</wfw:commentRss>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>中国信息社会下的“都市里的村庄”&#8211;社区传播生态个案研究 【作者：丁未】</title>
		<link>http://media.yejun.cn/wordpress/?p=2638</link>
		<comments>http://media.yejun.cn/wordpress/?p=2638#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 22 Jun 2010 11:07:47 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>admin</dc:creator>
		
		<category><![CDATA[2010年第二期]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://media.yejun.cn/wordpress/?p=2638</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[[摘要] 本文采用人类学田野调查法、社会空间地图法(sociospatial mapping)等多种研究方法，以深圳市石厦村这一华南地区城中村为个案，对这一社区的传播生态进行了较为全面的调研和分析，内容涉及了该社区公共场域所有的非商业性传播场所、商业性信息传播服务点，以及建立在这些硬件基础之上的流动人口信息传播行为和社会关系网络。论文试图以个案分析的路径，真实地反映农民工群体在传统文化、地缘关系网络和现代化媒介技术的交互作用下，如何实践着独具中国特色的信息传播活动，从而为探讨本土化的信息社会理论提供实证研究的依据。
[关键词] 中国信息社会  社区传播生态 流动人口 ICT实践 地缘关系网络
[Abstract] Adopted ethnographic and sociospatial mapping methods and taken the urban village in Southern China as a case , this paper try to illustrate what is information society in China’s context. The research conduct an comprehensive investigation on community communication ecology in ShiXia village which located in [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[摘要] 本文采用人类学田野调查法、社会空间地图法(sociospatial mapping)等多种研究方法，以深圳市石厦村这一华南地区城中村为个案，对这一社区的传播生态进行了较为全面的调研和分析，内容涉及了该社区公共场域所有的非商业性传播场所、商业性信息传播服务点，以及建立在这些硬件基础之上的流动人口信息传播行为和社会关系网络。论文试图以个案分析的路径，真实地反映农民工群体在传统文化、地缘关系网络和现代化媒介技术的交互作用下，如何实践着独具中国特色的信息传播活动，从而为探讨本土化的信息社会理论提供实证研究的依据。<br />
[关键词] 中国信息社会  社区传播生态 流动人口 ICT实践 地缘关系网络</p>
<p>[Abstract] Adopted ethnographic and sociospatial mapping methods and taken the urban village in Southern China as a case , this paper try to illustrate what is information society in China’s context. The research conduct an comprehensive investigation on community communication ecology in ShiXia village which located in the CBD of Shenzhen and inhabited by immigrant workers mostly from Chinese rural areas, including its non-business communication sites and media, business ICT shops and services, the practice and social networks of its ICT providers and consumers on these sites. The paper try to vividly depicts what is going on among these information have-less who are practicing ICT activities interplayed with traditional culture, geo-based social relationship and modern media technologies and so as to provides empirical evidence on exploring the Chinese model of information society.<br />
[Key Words] Chinese Information Society； Community Communication ；Ecology； Migrant Workers ； ICT Practice； Geo-based Network Society</p>
<p>PDF下载：<a href='http://media.yejun.cn/wordpress/wp-content/uploads/2010/06/e4b8ade59bbde4bfa1e681afe7a4bee4bc9ae4b88be79a84e2809ce983bde5b882e9878ce79a84e69d91e5ba84e2809defbc88e4b881e69caaefbc89.pdf' >中国信息社会下的“都市里的村庄”&#8211;社区传播生态个案研究 【作者：丁未】</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://media.yejun.cn/wordpress/?feed=rss2&amp;p=2638</wfw:commentRss>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>媒介建构论：权力、意义及其现实互动 【作者：江根源 季靖】</title>
		<link>http://media.yejun.cn/wordpress/?p=2637</link>
		<comments>http://media.yejun.cn/wordpress/?p=2637#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 22 Jun 2010 11:05:39 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>admin</dc:creator>
		
		<category><![CDATA[2010年第二期]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://media.yejun.cn/wordpress/?p=2637</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[[摘 要] 迄今为止，媒介建构思想已成全球性的学术思潮。本文首先探讨了伯格（Berger）和卢克曼（Luckmann）的社会建构主义（social constructivism）对媒介建构论的深刻影响；在此基础上，分析了“现实的互动模型”和“双锥模型”，阐述了符号现实、主观现实和客观现实之间的互动建构性；这种现实的建构思想集中关注“权力”（Power）和“意义”（Meaning）两大问题，前者集中于福柯（Foucault）所说的“微观权力”，这里主要指媒介内容选择过程中的一种权力运作关系。意义理论起源于语言符号学，尤以巴特（Barthe）的结构主义符号学为代表，意义来自读者对媒介内容的阐释；研究“意义”或“权力”，基本采用文化批评或者内容分析法来研究媒介话语与社会结构间的互动机制，从而发现“意义”的生成或者“权力”的运作。媒介建构思想虽然已经被广泛接受与应用，但是至今尚缺理论上的系统梳理。
[关键词] 媒介 权力 意义 现实
Abstract: So far, the thoughts on media’s social construction has become a global academic trend. Firstly, this paper discusses the profound impact on media’s social constructing theory by Berger and Luckmann’s social constructivism; On this basis, between the &#8220;realistic interaction model&#8221; and the &#8220;double cone model &#8220;are analyzed, [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[摘 要] 迄今为止，媒介建构思想已成全球性的学术思潮。本文首先探讨了伯格（Berger）和卢克曼（Luckmann）的社会建构主义（social constructivism）对媒介建构论的深刻影响；在此基础上，分析了“现实的互动模型”和“双锥模型”，阐述了符号现实、主观现实和客观现实之间的互动建构性；这种现实的建构思想集中关注“权力”（Power）和“意义”（Meaning）两大问题，前者集中于福柯（Foucault）所说的“微观权力”，这里主要指媒介内容选择过程中的一种权力运作关系。意义理论起源于语言符号学，尤以巴特（Barthe）的结构主义符号学为代表，意义来自读者对媒介内容的阐释；研究“意义”或“权力”，基本采用文化批评或者内容分析法来研究媒介话语与社会结构间的互动机制，从而发现“意义”的生成或者“权力”的运作。媒介建构思想虽然已经被广泛接受与应用，但是至今尚缺理论上的系统梳理。<br />
[关键词] 媒介 权力 意义 现实</p>
<p>Abstract: So far, the thoughts on media’s social construction has become a global academic trend. Firstly, this paper discusses the profound impact on media’s social constructing theory by Berger and Luckmann’s social constructivism; On this basis, between the &#8220;realistic interaction model&#8221; and the &#8220;double cone model &#8220;are analyzed, whese emphasizes the characteres of constructing interactively both of the symbolic reality, of subjective reality and objective reality. This thoughts focuses on two significant contents including of “power” and “Meaning”. The former focuses on &#8220;micro power&#8221; called by Foucault, which here mainly refers to the operation of a power relationship by media content’s selection process. The meaning theories generally originate in lingustics semiotics, especially in the structure semiotics represented in Barthe. Here the meaning comes from the reader&#8217;s interpretation of media content; To study &#8220;meaning&#8221; or &#8220;power&#8221;, the basic method taken by mainly refers to studing the interactng mechanisms between media discourses and the social structures. The media’s constructing thoughts has been widely accepted and applied by more and more communication researchers, but so far still lack a systematically theoretical carding.<br />
Key Words: Media; Power; Meaning; Reality</p>
<p>PDF下载：<a href='http://media.yejun.cn/wordpress/wp-content/uploads/2010/06/e5aa92e4bb8be5bbbae69e84e8aebaefbc88e6b19fe6a0b9e6ba90efbc89.pdf' >媒介建构论：权力、意义及其现实互动 【作者：江根源 季靖】</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://media.yejun.cn/wordpress/?feed=rss2&amp;p=2637</wfw:commentRss>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>媒介趣味论：趣味传播时代的媒介透视 【作者：李蓉】媒介趣味论：趣味传播时代的媒介透视 【作者：李蓉】</title>
		<link>http://media.yejun.cn/wordpress/?p=2633</link>
		<comments>http://media.yejun.cn/wordpress/?p=2633#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 22 Jun 2010 11:03:59 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>admin</dc:creator>
		
		<category><![CDATA[2010年第二期]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://media.yejun.cn/wordpress/?p=2633</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[【摘要】:当今时代的媒介传播活动，正在发生从信息传播到趣味传播的转型。这是一个信息传播与趣味传播共生、并存和交织的时代。在媒介传播中，信息传播是直接性、确定性、目的性与功能性的方面，趣味传播是其中间接性、隐含性、过程性与非现实功利性的方面。媒介趣味是趣味传播时代的产物与表征。媒介趣味是以媒介为载体呈现出来的传播内容所蕴涵的具有集体性、普遍性或类型化的精神意趣。它是传者驱动、受者反馈和媒介形式制约三方面综合互动的产物，其动力结构应是一种具有交互联系性、独立平等性、可沟通理解性的间性主体。共感化、符号化、感官化有系统地构成了媒介趣味的内在生成机制，分别主要联系着媒介趣味的生产、显现与接受。
【关键词】：媒介研究 趣味传播 媒介趣味 间性主体  
Abstract: Nowadays media communication is transforming from information communication to taste communication. It is time for information communication and taste communication to accrete, coexist and interact with each other. In media communication, information communication refers to its directness, determinacy, purposiveness and functionality, while taste transmission refers to indirectness, implicitly, procedural [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>【摘要】:当今时代的媒介传播活动，正在发生从信息传播到趣味传播的转型。这是一个信息传播与趣味传播共生、并存和交织的时代。在媒介传播中，信息传播是直接性、确定性、目的性与功能性的方面，趣味传播是其中间接性、隐含性、过程性与非现实功利性的方面。媒介趣味是趣味传播时代的产物与表征。媒介趣味是以媒介为载体呈现出来的传播内容所蕴涵的具有集体性、普遍性或类型化的精神意趣。它是传者驱动、受者反馈和媒介形式制约三方面综合互动的产物，其动力结构应是一种具有交互联系性、独立平等性、可沟通理解性的间性主体。共感化、符号化、感官化有系统地构成了媒介趣味的内在生成机制，分别主要联系着媒介趣味的生产、显现与接受。<br />
【关键词】：媒介研究 趣味传播 媒介趣味 间性主体  </p>
<p>Abstract: Nowadays media communication is transforming from information communication to taste communication. It is time for information communication and taste communication to accrete, coexist and interact with each other. In media communication, information communication refers to its directness, determinacy, purposiveness and functionality, while taste transmission refers to indirectness, implicitly, procedural and non-utilitarian. Media taste is the product and token of the taste communication.<br />
Media taste, defined in this paper, is a spiritual interest with three features: collectivity, universality and stylization, which is generated by the communicators, appreciated by the audience and affected by the media form. Media taste is the product of interactions among the information senders, media and the audience, hence the dynamic construction of media taste is inter-subjectivity, which is involved in the perspectives of alternative affiliation，independency equality and communicable comprehension. Empathy, signalization and sensitization constitute inner creative mechanism which mainly relates with the process of producing, displaying and accepting of media taste.<br />
Key word: media research; taste communication; media taste; inter-subjectivity</p>
<p>PDF下载：<a href='http://media.yejun.cn/wordpress/wp-content/uploads/2010/06/e5aa92e4bb8be8b6a3e591b3e79086e8aebae7a094e7a9b6efbc88e69d8ee89389efbc89.pdf' >媒介趣味论：趣味传播时代的媒介透视 【作者：李蓉】</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://media.yejun.cn/wordpress/?feed=rss2&amp;p=2633</wfw:commentRss>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>“中国模式”的媒介呈现：西方及国际社会关于中国的话语想象 【作者：侯洪 周军】</title>
		<link>http://media.yejun.cn/wordpress/?p=2630</link>
		<comments>http://media.yejun.cn/wordpress/?p=2630#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 22 Jun 2010 11:01:16 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>admin</dc:creator>
		
		<category><![CDATA[2010年第二期]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://media.yejun.cn/wordpress/?p=2630</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[[摘  要] 2009年媒介中呈现出的西方及国际社会对“中国模式”的热议，已成为国际新闻传播中的一道独特风景线，它与以往习见的“黄祸论”、“中国崩溃论”、“中国威胁论”形成鲜明对照。对此西方话语建构物呈现出的高度转向及其传播学意义，应当引起崛起的中国和中国新闻传播界的高度重视与关注。本文以此景观为探讨对象，大致梳理了这一命题的提出及被热议的现实语境，并就这些文本从经济、政治、文化和心态四个侧面予以解读，进而从主体间性层面剖析媒介“中国模式”的中外话语建构指向及其功能意义。
[关键词]媒介“中国模式”；话语转向；传播生态；媒介分析
Abstract: As it appeared in the media in 2009, the heated discussions about the “China Model” among western countries and the international community has already become characteristic of international media. It is in sharp contrast with phrases such as “Yellow Peril”, “The Collapse of China” and “China Threat” usually heard in the [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[摘  要] 2009年媒介中呈现出的西方及国际社会对“中国模式”的热议，已成为国际新闻传播中的一道独特风景线，它与以往习见的“黄祸论”、“中国崩溃论”、“中国威胁论”形成鲜明对照。对此西方话语建构物呈现出的高度转向及其传播学意义，应当引起崛起的中国和中国新闻传播界的高度重视与关注。本文以此景观为探讨对象，大致梳理了这一命题的提出及被热议的现实语境，并就这些文本从经济、政治、文化和心态四个侧面予以解读，进而从主体间性层面剖析媒介“中国模式”的中外话语建构指向及其功能意义。<br />
[关键词]媒介“中国模式”；话语转向；传播生态；媒介分析</p>
<p>Abstract: As it appeared in the media in 2009, the heated discussions about the “China Model” among western countries and the international community has already become characteristic of international media. It is in sharp contrast with phrases such as “Yellow Peril”, “The Collapse of China” and “China Threat” usually heard in the past. The major turn revealed by this western discourse construct and its significance in communication studies deserve to be highly valued and closely followed by China in the rise and the Chinese media community. With this phenomena as the object of study, this paper first surveys the realistic context of how this phrase is put forward and heatedly discussed, and then gives interpretations from economic, political, cultural and mentality perspectives based on these texts. On this basis, this paper further analyzes, on the level of intersubjectivity, the Chinese and foreign discourse construction reference of “China Model” of the media and its functional significance.<br />
Key words: “China Model” of the media, discourse turn, communication ecology, media analysis</p>
<p>PDF下载：<a href='http://media.yejun.cn/wordpress/wp-content/uploads/2010/06/e5aa92e4bb8be2809ce4b8ade59bbde6a8a1e5bc8fe2809defbc9ae8a5bfe696b9e58f8ae59bbde99985e7a4bee4bc9ae585b3e4ba8ee4b8ade59bbde79a84e8af9d.pdf' >“中国模式”的媒介呈现：西方及国际社会关于中国的话语想象 【作者：侯洪 周军】</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://media.yejun.cn/wordpress/?feed=rss2&amp;p=2630</wfw:commentRss>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>论迪斯尼的“快乐与童话生活”话语体系的构建 【作者：关萍萍】</title>
		<link>http://media.yejun.cn/wordpress/?p=2627</link>
		<comments>http://media.yejun.cn/wordpress/?p=2627#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 22 Jun 2010 11:00:02 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>admin</dc:creator>
		
		<category><![CDATA[2010年第二期]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://media.yejun.cn/wordpress/?p=2627</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[[摘要]作为目前全球最大的媒体娱乐公司之一的迪斯尼，以其动画电影和迪斯尼乐园为主要方式形成了一套成熟的表达系统，构建出一个具有鲜明特色知识与真理体系，即“快乐与童话生活”的话语结构，从而在消费者的消费视野中确立了牢固的位置。本文从迪斯尼动画电影的“童话化”改编、迪斯尼乐园的活动设置、人物角色设置及环境设计几个方面分析迪斯尼的“快乐与童话生活”的话语体系构建方式。
[关键词]迪斯尼；快乐；童话；话语体系
Abstract: As the world&#8217;s largest media and entertainment company, Disney has formed its expression system using its animated films and Disneyland, which is the discourse system of happy and fairy tale life. Now Disney has established a solid position as a world&#8211;class animation empire in the consumer perspective. This paper uses Foucault&#8217;s discourse theory to [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[摘要]作为目前全球最大的媒体娱乐公司之一的迪斯尼，以其动画电影和迪斯尼乐园为主要方式形成了一套成熟的表达系统，构建出一个具有鲜明特色知识与真理体系，即“快乐与童话生活”的话语结构，从而在消费者的消费视野中确立了牢固的位置。本文从迪斯尼动画电影的“童话化”改编、迪斯尼乐园的活动设置、人物角色设置及环境设计几个方面分析迪斯尼的“快乐与童话生活”的话语体系构建方式。<br />
[关键词]迪斯尼；快乐；童话；话语体系</p>
<p>Abstract: As the world&#8217;s largest media and entertainment company, Disney has formed its expression system using its animated films and Disneyland, which is the discourse system of happy and fairy tale life. Now Disney has established a solid position as a world&#8211;class animation empire in the consumer perspective. This paper uses Foucault&#8217;s discourse theory to analyze the Disney&#8217;s discourse system of happy and fairy tale life, which includes the &#8216;Fairy Tales&#8217; adaptation of animated films, the activities and characters in the Disneyland, and the desigh of the Disneyland&#8217;s environment. The purpose of this paper is to reveal its successful secrets which will be helpful for Chinese animation industry.<br />
Key Words: Disney; Happy; Fairy Tales; Discourse System</p>
<p>PDF下载：<a href='http://media.yejun.cn/wordpress/wp-content/uploads/2010/06/e8aebae8bfaae696afe5b0bce5bfabe4b990e4b88ee7aba5e8af9de7949fe6b4bbe8af9de8afade4bd93e7b3bbe79a84e69e84e5bbbaefbc88e585b3e8908de8908d.pdf' >论迪斯尼的“快乐与童话生活”话语体系的构建 【作者：关萍萍】</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://media.yejun.cn/wordpress/?feed=rss2&amp;p=2627</wfw:commentRss>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
